AIQURIS covers every obligation that applies to each AI deployment, specifies every control that meets them and assesses the evidence, until your compliance holds up in a conformity assessment or audit. For providers and deployers.
"Ensure appropriate human oversight." The Act doesn't say what that means for your candidate screening AI assistant, and the harmonised standards that should say it are still being finalised.
Legal, data science, IT security, data protection and the business each hold one piece. Compliance only exists when the pieces fit together, for each deployment.
Consulting projects take months per system and go out of date when the system changes. Across dozens of AI systems, that doesn't scale.
Knowing your obligations is not meeting them.
A platform, not a consulting project. Every deployment is assessed the same way, in weeks, not months, at a fraction of the cost.
Built on your actual AI use cases, not on templates. Every control is derived from how each system is used.
Provider or deployer; high-risk, transparency or minimal risk. Every obligation that applies is covered.
Organisation-wide controls and evidence, such as AI literacy, oversight roles and data governance, are reused across deployments. Each new assessment takes less effort than the last.
Evidence for every control, in an audit-ready report and a live AI register. Whether you have to certify or choose to, you are ready.
A risk class is not a defence. Evidence is.
Risk class and your role, from the description of the deployment.
Each obligation becomes the controls that meet it, together with GDPR and the relevant standards.
Met, partly met or open, with the evidence each control requires.
The evidence for your conformity assessment, declaration of conformity or audit.
Weeks, not months, for the first deployment. Less for every one after.
And it stays current: when the Act, its standards or your deployment change, the live register shows what to re-assess.
Each obligation becomes a requirement, a question, the evidence that answers it and a named owner. Nothing stays at the level of "comply with Article 26".
One of the 26 controls behind the assessment above.
We sit on the key standardisation committees. We know every standard the Act relies on, including those still being drafted, and how each one relates to its articles.
Our TÜV SÜD heritage means we also know audit and certification from the inside. Your controls are built to hold up when an auditor or a regulator checks them.
One assessment covers the Act, data protection law and the other sources that apply. No separate EU AI Act project.
Meet the team and their standards work →AIQURIS does not give legal advice. Your legal team stays in charge, with a structured basis to work from.
Every compliance assessment starts with the impact of the AI. IMPACT+ puts ISO/IEC 42005, the international standard for AI impact assessment, into practice. Describe one deployment and see who could be affected, how badly, and how deep the assessment needs to go next. No sales call needed.
Transparency obligations apply now. High-risk obligations follow in December 2027. Bring one AI system you use or sell in the EU. In one call we establish your role, the obligations that apply, and how far you are from compliance you can prove. Or take it through an Assessment Sprint in three weeks.
